Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
What we are seeing is why we should not support closed models. The companies like OpenAI and Anthropic can change the rules of usage at any time they like and for any reason. Today it’s reverse engineering. Tomorrow who knows what.
There was no official ruling from the courts that forced them to do this. This was just something they didn’t like.
Remember that these are the companies that gave millions to Trump
as a bribefor the inauguration.I’m just waiting for them to start altering the results like muskrat did with grok. “Who won the election” and those type of questions will start to have a right wing fascist bend…
The original sin of the search engine to big businesses was establishing the idea that audiences should expect any sense of division between paid ads and results to their queries (even if in some ways this has always been a fantasy).
AI is a gift from the gods in terms of correcting that original sin!
Grok has bias but let’s not pretend the others do not.
https://trakkr.ai/bias/findings
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/measuring-perceived-slant-large-language-models-through-user (article: https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/05/ai-models-llms-chatgpt-claude-gemini-partisan-bias-research-study)
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/29974100.2026.2667948
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10817610
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/interactive/2026/06/24/are-ai-chatbots-like-chatgpt-politically-biased-we-tested-them
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-023-01097-2