The California governor described White House reporters as ‘sycophants’

California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the media for what he described as overly deferential coverage of Donald Trump, characterizing reporters in Oval Office press briefings as “sycophants.”

The Democratic governor — widely seen as a potential contender for the 2028 presidential race — made the remarks during a Sunday interview with progressive commentator Jack Cocchiarella.

Cocchiarella pressed Newsom on what he framed as “hesitancy” within the White House press corps to scrutinize certain subjects: namely, the 80-year-old president’s health.

“You see these press conferences in the Oval Office,” the governor replied. “You maybe have one or two reasonable reporters. They ask a question; there’s no chance for a follow-up. And then it’s seven sycophants from news outlets.”

  • edible_funk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    When was that debunked? How? If you genuinely think misogyny and misogynoir weren’t part of why Hillary and Kamala lost then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      What you’re missing is that even racists and misogynists will vote for women or minorities if they say the right talking points. Just look at all the pick-mes on the fascist side. This argument is always trotted out by “centrists” against progressives, but the centrists love to run women and minorities, act like that makes them progressive, and blame racism/misogyny when they lose for being uninspiring empty suits. I’m sick of the hypocrisy.

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s not what I’m missing. That’s not what I’m saying. You’re also ignoring that racists and sexists who otherwise agree with the talking points will refuse to vote for women or minorities, but that’s neither here nor there. Bro said definitively that racism and sexism had nothing whatsoever to do with Hillary and Kamala losing. Considering the wildly racist and sexist history and culture of the US, I’m saying that’s fuckin nonsense. Is it the only or even the main reason they lost? No probably not. Did it have an influence? Abso-fuckin-lutely. Saying anything else is naive or disingenuous.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I get where you’re coming from. I just think people are sick of hearing the argument that we shouldn’t run woman or minority candidates because racism/misogyny will harm their chance of success, myself included. I believe that the number of people who will absolutely refuse to ever vote for a woman or minority is often greatly exaggerated, and the number of people harboring racist/misogynist views who would still vote for a woman or minority in the right circumstances is vastly underestimated. When we talk about why a candidate won or lost an election it’s disingenuous to attribute it to something that had only a minor impact when compared to something that has proven to have had a massive (and election swinging) impact. In the case of the 2024 presidential election that something was Harris’s support for Israel’s genocide, and so it isn’t wrong to say that was the deciding factor in the election and racism/misogyny wasn’t.

          • edible_funk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh yeah no, I’m not arguing we shouldnt; we should. I’m not even saying it was a particularly significant factor, but it’s naive at best to think there was no impact. I’m arguing US Americans are largely racist and sexist because of all the overwhelming historical cultural racism and sexism more or less built into the foundations of this country. We should strive to be better, but we should be realistic about what and who we are. It’s not a pretty picture. We elected Donald Trump twice. And it wasn’t republicans that got him elected, it was the rest of us letting them. And all that aside I’m sure we could all find dozens of examples of more qualified women and POC losing out to less qualified white men. We had to make laws because of that shit. Racism and misogyny absolutely without doubt affected Hillary and Kamala’s chances. It’s incredibly naive to think otherwise. Three administration has spent the last year and a half rolling back protections for women and minorities pretty much entirely due to sexism and racism; I’m not off base here. Also if everyone here can actually read you’ll all realize I never said it was the most important or primary deciding factor. OP said it had no effect whatsoever and this is America so that is bullshit, so I called that out. I never said how significant a factor it was, just that it’s stupid to discount how racist and sexist the average American is because of our generally racist and sexist society.

            The genocide thing wasn’t a significant reason though, that just kept the group that mostly doesn’t vote anyway from voting. Also anyone that didn’t vote for that reason is fucking dumb because they defacto chose more genocide with Trump.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Go ahead and sell me that bridge because there is a complete and total lack of evidence to support the claim. Can’t really prove a counterfactual. Others made the claim she lost because of this; when asked for evidence, they always come up short.

      Counterpoints:

      • Biden polled worse than Harris at the end. (White Guy polling worse than Black Woman). Hence the switch in the first place, even Biden agreed!

      • Michelle Obama has always polled higher than anyone against Trump (Black Woman polling better than White Guy).

      Sexists bigots were already core Republican voters never voting for any D no matter who. The battle was lost elsewhere.

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh so you’re just operating under the assumption that nobody who would otherwise vote for a democrat is sexist or racist in one of the most overtly provably sexist and racist countries on earth. But go ahead and claim that racism and misogyny aren’t incredibly relevant factors in every election. There are more undecided/moderate/non voters that are racist and misogynistic than there are republicans. It’s fucking stupid to pretend that wasn’t a factor. Don’t be fucking stupid.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Still no evidence, and an increased propensity for aggression and ad hominems substituting said total lack of evidence, I see. Lots of fingers-in-ear denial and deflection as well.

          Certainly aren’t convincing me of anything, lol.

          I win.

          • edible_funk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Like a pigeon playing chess you knock over the pieces, shit all over the board and think you won. Good job pigeon.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              hahah buddy, I checkmated you two comments ago; you just haven’t realized it yet.

              Pee-wee chess, though, I get it. Still learning.

              • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                You’ve got serious “racism was solved until Obama” energy. Par for the course with the likes of you.

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  There you go with the fallacies again… What is this, Pokemon of fallacies? Trying to catch 'em all or something?

                  Well you’ve caught strawman.

                  • edible_funk@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    You’re operating under the fallacy that every single racist and sexist in the US already and exclusively vote republican. That’s fuckin stupid.