• jeanpascal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 days ago

    The report stresses that AI companies maintain some fundamental differences from the businesses that dominated the dotcom boom of the late 1990s, which was defined by speculative excess and an overreliance on debt financing. Many of the top AI companies, by contrast, are more mature, profitable and maintain healthier balance sheets, which could blunt the impacts of the “bubble” bursting — or if it bursts at all.

    Sorry, what profit? I mean, Nvidia is making a killing, but the rest? https://isaiprofitable.com/

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 days ago

      Well, I take that to mean that Google (ad profit), Meta (ad profit), and Nvidia (hardware profit) are profitable companies even if AI is a notorious money-sink. I do agree that if they weren’t able to absorb vertigo-inducing billions of dollars of AI losses via their other income, the AI bubble would have popped already.

      • jeanpascal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Ah yeah, I see what you mean. When the article mentioned AI companies, I was thinking of OpenAI, Anthropic etc. only, but true that Google could absorb a hit from a bubble. Not sure how they’ll do long term, since they’re all in on this and planning to remake completely how you search with them.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Except LLMs are hurting Google’s ad revenue. Companies don’t want to pay for views they can’t verify are even people. On top of their LLM results box pushing their sponsored results down the page, and removing people’s likelihood to click into any links, where AdSense might be present