• Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s just straight up not true, you need to build the dammed things and that leaves s big footprint.

      • AliOski@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Okay so what do you want to do? Go back to the stone age? Get of your phone and follow the ways of Ted Kaczynski.

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          So it’s either out-of-control consumer production or back to stone age? No in between?

          • AliOski@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The in-between was disregarded over a nitpick for it not being “perfectly” carbon neutral.

            That person would complain because the carbon footprint of my fart is too big.

        • Smaile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          How about just acknowledge the obvious downside and not making stuff up, dolt.

          • AliOski@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What downside? I really do not understand what you are talking about. Your only critique is that I said “no carbon footprint” instead of “a much smaller comparatively insignificant carbon footprint”, which in my opinion is just dishonest nitpicking.