• HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    8 days ago

    My dude, I didn’t leap to any conclusions. I said quite explicitly I had no way of knowing anything about your ban because all you’ve done is complain about something completely tangential in a reply to my comment.

    Did you not read my first four words of my reply? I never said you did. Want me to write that in a different language? Different font?

    Sorry to hear you dislike how conversations go from tangential topic to tangential topic. Might I suggest deleting your account so you never have to suffer such horror again?

    If you’re so upset about this ban on your account named “throwaway” why don’t you just make another disposable account to harass complete strangers about irrelevant moderation decisions?

    My username is a pun. If we’re talking about irrelevance, why do you want to talk about usernames?

    Classic .ml behavior - good faith arguments are frowned upon.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      21·
      8 days ago

      I think maybe, given the dearth of evidence you’ve provided to the contrary, your ban may have been justified.

      Good luck with your appeal, and goodbye.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        8 days ago

        Nah, I’m neither an imperialist apologist nor a troll.

        It’s pretty easy to tell that it’s not the case because you cite absolutely nothing (because you’re right, there is a dearth - a total lack - of evidence). It’s probable that y’all just don’t like dissent and ban people for it.

        Here watch, I’ll do it to you:

        You, underisk@lemmy.ml, are a racist. There’s tons of evidence to support that, but I won’t be citing any of it.

        Goodbye.