“Do I annihilate the Islamic Republic, and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again? Do I drive them into hell”
The post ‘Do I Annihilate the Islamic Republic?’ Trump Issues Shocking Threat to Iran in UN Speech first appeared on Mediaite.
Sure, the lost trust was not worth it. He could’ve just asked politely for the same thing.
He talks a lot of bullshit, but even he underestimated the stamina of the Danish Foreign Minister when it comes to maintaining a bullshit dialogue.
However, I don’t think that portraying it as if the bully got framed is a good way to see it, because that acknowledges the behaviour of the bully and that Denmark stooped down to play with the bully. It’s a fair description, but not really useful for anything other than critisism. We need to look forward.
I still prefer to view it as an agreement between allies rather than a win/lose scenario. Once the passageways over the Arctic opens it will be beneficial to Nato and EU that China doesn’t have the opportunity to interfere economically.
It also solidifies Greenlands position among the “western” world if/when they decide to become independent. If they went independent right now, they’d be a 3rd world country, and we already know how China likes to “invest” in 3rd world countries for their own benefit only.
I think the trust is gone for lots of other reasons as well, so it will take decades to rebuild that. Again, we need to look ahead, and this agreement is a small step in the right direction.