Assembly Bill 2164 authored by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda) would have prohibited California’s governor from recognizing a request for extradition of a person related to their providing a legally protected healthcare activity in the Golden State to transgender individuals, or if they provide reproductive services. It provided certain exemptions, such as an extradition required by federal law.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, the lead sponsor of the bill, noted 18 governors have “signed identical provisions into law without fanfare”

    DNC voters when they let this guy through and lose again:

  • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I suspect that earlier in his governorship he was willing to go along more with the Democratic legislature because he knew it would not risk his re-election. Now that he has his eyes on the presidency he is going straight down the middle, which these days is basically the Right.

    • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      which these days is basically the Right

      By European standards, the American center is on par with AfD, Örebro, and Borgernes Parti. Gavin Newsom is a right wing fascist.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The Democratic party has put us in this position and for that, they have my deepest disappointment.

  • Binette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Once again, the only thing leftist can be reprimanded for is being right too early.

    • Postimo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I mean this isn’t even just not progressive, this is collaboration with fascist states to do fascism.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Newsom is a neoliberal. Neoliberals are conservatives. He is controlled opposition. He will try to trick the public into believing he is progressive in 2028. He is a pathological liar and conman just like any other conservative.

  • pamparana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This guy is also horrible but the bar is so low these days… The democratic party is also responsible for the mess we are in. They stopped being a party of the people long time ago. Need to purge the Schumers, Pelosis and Newsoms.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I can’t wait to get yelled at by democrats when i refuse to vote for this shit head in a few years.

    • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just one more neolib bro! We’ll get someone worth a damn, you just gotta support one more shithead I promise!!

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Hopefully he doesn’t make it past the primaries. Unfortunately if he does and he’s up against a MAGA Republican, there’s only one clear choice.

      Go help campaign for progressive candidates before the primaries! Come November 2028, it may be too late.

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Republicans deserve to be yelled at, and if it’s newsom or vance and you choose vance by not voting, you’re a republican and deserve to be yelled at.

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Basically he said that he thinks this should be left up to the governor, whoever that is, and no matter how righteous and well intentioned, the issue shouldn’t be decided for all time this way, eroding future governors’ authority.

    What a spineless position. Why pass any laws at all? Why not leave everything up to the whims of whoever is in office?

    Doesn’t the legislature decide issues all the time and enshrine those decisions for the future in law? Isn’t that what they do? Why the fuck should extradition for providing healthcare be any different? Isn’t he “eroding the authority” of the legislature in saying no, we should leave this as governor’s discretion, just in principle?

    I’m not just hating Newsom reflexively here. I seriously don’t understand his argument, despite trying.

  • someone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This guys slept with his best friend’s wife and then blamed it on alcoholism. What kind of piece of shit do you have to be to do something like that? It’s so treacherous and lacking in empathy to sleep with a best friend’s wife that there has to be a fundamental absence of conscience; and the fact that it wasn’t illegal and he could blame it on alcoholism meant he was able to sweep his vileness under the rug for voter’s to overlook.

    This vote doesn’t surprise me. This vote should surprise no one. Gavin Newsom has always been terrible.

    This is also an example of how money and power have infected progressivism. If the public really had a real selection of candidates instead of curated talking heads, this situation wouldn’t be occurring. The power of wealthy donors or publicity from privately owned rich media conglomerates ensures that usually only the pre-selected are in the public sphere.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The booze would explain why this douche canoe swerves wildly back and forth across that centrist line line he’s trying to run down a rabbit in a Ferrari.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I sincerely hope that a progressive governor replaces this shitbird. Newsom might be better than any given member of the GOP, but that bar is in hell.

  • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve never done lesser evil voting and I’m certainly not gonna start of this bastard gets the nom. Been voting for the leftmost candidate running and that includes third parties. Not like it matters anyway since I live in a deep red state.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As you said, it doesn’t matter because you don’t live in anything resembling a swing state, but for those of us who do: please vote strategically. Vote for whomever you like in the primary. (And DO vote in the primary, for fuck’s sake!) Vote for Bernie Sanders. (I did!) Vote for the DSA candidate. (I often do.) Vote for the green party, or libertarians, or write in your cool uncle. Whatever! The primary is your time to vote for who you really want. But when it comes to the general election, please vote for the left-most nominee of the party that has a realistic shot at winning. It doesn’t always feel good, but there are exactly three options in a first past the post general election:

      1. Voting for the party that can win.

      2. Voting for the other party that can win.

      3. Not participating. You might think your write-in or third party is distinct from Option #3. I regret to inform you that it isn’t.

      If we were to do this for a decade or so, the GOP would evaporate and the Dems would eventually split into a neoliberal pro-business party and a progressive pro-labor party. Do I want Newsom to be the nominee? Fuck no. I hate that prick. But if he’s the one running against Marco Rubio or whoever? Yeah, I can hold my nose and fill in that bubble.

      If we fail to do this, we only empower fascists. Look around.

      (And BTW, the party more likely to give us Ranked Choice so we don’t need to do this is, you guessed it, the Democrats…)

      • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No. I will not vote for a fucking candidate who will not do the bare fucking minimum to protect me as a trans person. Absolutely the fuck not.

        • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I understand your frustration, but if you stick to this, you will be abstaining entirely from the electoral process.

          Once again, there are only three choices:

          1. Party that can win.

          2. Other party that can win.

          3. Shooting yourself in the dick.

          You seem to be a #3 voter. Is feeling good about shooting yourself in the dick really better than effecting real change? Nah.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Honestly unless you have ranked choice or similar option, vote and get those you can, for the left most candidates with a chance of winning. Leaping from far right to far left isn’t going to happen but will take steps. Don’t waste your vote, make it and others count and vote out the republicans/crazy right.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Newsome is basically a “moderate” republican at this point, so voting him out in the primary should be everyone’s goal, especially if they want a candidate that isn’t going to alienate significant portions of the voter base.

        • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          If you read what I wrote i didn’t say to vote for him, in fact I said for the most left person that can win. Its not worth splitting votes on progressives and letting Republicans and right wing win instead. That’s how we get maga and trump.

          Perfection is nice but reality is more important

          Look at what happened in CA. The progressives split and now the govt is once again moderate dem or republican

          • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Sure but, newsome isn’t a progressive, the point is that voting for “moderates” in the primary splits the party and looses elections.

            If newsome wins the 2028 primary, dems probably won’t take the majorities they need to actually govern.

            I doubt democrats will lose in any situation in 2028 because the economy is going to be in the toilet for another 2 years. But 2032 will probably be another republican victory if someone like newsome is in the White House.