• NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Then we’ve narrowed the disagreement quite a bit. You accept that LLMs can be used effectively, you’re just asserting that they’re misused far more often than not.

    But both that and “anyone with eyes can see thousands of companies are wasting their money” are still just restating your conclusion baselessly.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Then we’ve narrowed the disagreement quite a bit. You accept that LLMs can be used effectively,

      I never said they couldn’t. In fact, saying as much was the first thing I said to you

      restating your conclusion baselessly

      My observations have just as much merit as your speculation that somehow companies by default make good decisions. I don’t know why you have it stuck in your head that is a valid logical foundation, but you are incorrect.

      In any case, you clearly don’t have anything else to offer, so I think we’re done here. Have a nice day!

      • NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Arguing against something I didn’t say. I never claimed companies “by default make good decisions.” I said thousands of independent companies and individuals repeatedly choosing to pay for a tool is reasonable evidence that it provides some value to them. That’s not some corporate infallibility, it’s revealed preference.

        Your personal observations are anecdotes. If your claim is that LLMs are far more often harmful than useful, support it?