- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
- bearforcepilot@lemmy.ziptoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Are artcraft apps considered slop or they have potential?32·1 day ago
What if we just learned to code and wrote if ourselves and took some personal interest in the lines we produce?
- bearforcepilot@lemmy.ziptoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Are artcraft apps considered slop or they have potential?2·1 day ago
Almost by definition, maintainability doesn’t refer to a “specific part”
https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/blog/artcraft-adobe-clone-ai-code-quality/
I’m not interested in getting into an argument about this any further, look through their github issues, there’s plenty to learn.
As a note, if you think they’re genuinely reviewing this much code at this speed, I think you need to consider the logistics of that.
- bearforcepilot@lemmy.ziptoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Are artcraft apps considered slop or they have potential?141·1 day ago
Also unsustainable: the code they generate.
It’s huge, sprawling and messy.
https://github.com/storytold/photocraft/issues/6903
https://github.com/storytold/artcraft/issues/2273
https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/blog/artcraft-adobe-clone-ai-code-quality/
Exactly. Lots of good stuff written in Rust!
- bearforcepilot@lemmy.ziptoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Offline file tools in one browser tab: OpenFile, a free MIT toolkit that never uploads your files4·5 days ago
This is almost entirely AI generated by the looks of it.
The code, the readme, the website.
Alternatively, many of these exploits are dependent on extremely niche situations that are mostly handled by existing safeguards.
I’d be interested to see the actual real world severity of these - are they actually things that could be used in an exploit in any meaningful way?
RCE is substantially more severe, it’s possible there just aren’t as many, as they aren’t as applicable to highly contrived scenarios