Not power off, but suspend it every single time I’m not using it. It is never on when I’m not using it. I have never done that. Why waste power and the life of the parts? Seems very unnecessary to me.
Who the fuck leaves their pc “idle”? What is MS sniffing?
I just want some HDDs for my server, that’s all. Is that too much to ask? They’re fire now. $300 for a 4tb HDD? That’s a crime.
Steve from Gamers Nexus has been screaming from the roof tops for a couple of years now, but all the “mainstream news outlets” that are supposed to be for the people, ignored him and kept praising goldfish-face Jensen and made him look like a god with his ugly-ass leather jacket.
We all saw it from the very beginning. It’s all about the short term gains and to make those graphs point upwards. It doesn’t matter the means and the consequences of that, just make sure they go up. That’s it. Fuck you and me average fucks who just want to buy 2TB of storage for their pc or a fucking 32GB of RAM. Y’all in the West seriously need to bring back guillotines and public execution.
The honest answer? I don’t know the difference and never cared to learn it. I just use GPL3 because of Linux (I know Linus likes GPL2) and I like the idea of completely open and also the idea of contributing back. That’s why.
I didn’t know that part to be honest. Good to know. I always thought they had to be an actual PR. lol. So corpos basically love other licenses because they don’t even want the code to be available
I have several personal projects and they’re all GPL3 because that’s the only license that makes sense in my head. That’s why I came here asking, because I genuinely didn’t understand why anyone would use anything else for open source.
More of “I won’t look like the asshole when I don’t care about the project they’re using because I gave them code with no strings attached” lol
When AI becomes SkyNet, they’ll pull your code in their database and spare your life.
Now it makes total sense. Thank you
So basically, you’re showing potential employers that you’re not too strict with your code on corporations? I see what you mean. I also wish you the best of luck, btw.
Aahhh, so you’re saying when it’s a MIT and BSD licenses, the original developer doesn’t really have to maintain the code since the business isn’t really obligated to contribute back their changes. “Hey, I’m giving you this code and it’s up to you if you want to maintain/improve/add more to it”. Does that sound right?
So do project that are under the GPL license force you to care how it’s used and force you to support them? This is a genuine question, not an argument, btw.
This makes sense, but am I allowed to ask "why do those corporations who will only use software until under mit license or BSD, not want to contribute back? Wouldn’t that make them leeches?
That still doesn’t answer the question, why does anyone choose anything other than GPL? I’m having a hard time expressing my question the way it is reading in my head. Damn you, English.
Ok so I wouldn’t be wrong calling it “stupid” then. Thank you
Honest question, why would anyone use those MIT and BSD licenses? To me personally (no disrespect intended here), it seems very stupid. If I understand correctly, these licenses allow you to take the code and make it proprietary and you don’t have to contribute your changes back like GPL requires! If I’m understanding this wrong, please do explain. Thanks.
Fucking thank you. I thought it was insane. This is next level carelessness to me.